Cross-border Implementation of Institutional Repository: A case of Aga Khan University

NGURE, Mary, SHARIF, Ashraf and GATITI, Peter (2015) Cross-border Implementation of Institutional Repository: A case of Aga Khan University. Paper presented at: IFLA WLIC 2015 - Cape Town, South Africa in Session 198 - Information Technology.

Bookmark or cite this item:
Language: English (Original)
Available under licence Creative Commons Attribution.


Cross-border Implementation of Institutional Repository: A case of Aga Khan University

Institutions globally have increasingly embraced Institutional Repositories (IRs) to collect, showcase, archive, and preserve their intellectual and scholarly output. Many benefits are gained from implementation of the platform including: the institution’s visibility, status and reputation is increased; authors get wider public access and visibility thus more citations for their work; long-term preservation of research; and the library benefits from its new role in information creation and distribution thus the opportunity to re-assert its importance in the face of declining user dependence on libraries for simple access to information (Sharif 2013). Despite the high uptake of IRs to manage institutions’ digital resources more effectively, little has been written on the experience of cross-border implementation. This paper seeks to fill this gap by presenting unique lessons learnt from the implementation of Digital Commons (DC), a proprietary hosted institutional repository platform by Bepress. The platform is implemented across AKU’s 7 campuses in 5 countries (United Kingdom, Pakistan, Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania). The varying technological, economical, and cultural contexts of these countries have had effect on the implementation of the platform and have presented some unique and interesting lessons. Cross-border implementation faces many distinctive challenges. From AKU experience, these include lack of a national body for co-ordinating IRs in majority of the countries where AKU is operating; and inequalities in technical expertise, internet access, extent of use, and social support. On the other hand, institutions receive immense benefits from cross-border implementation. Key benefits include: IR helps address the unevenness in availability of researchers’ output where Africa for instance accounts for only 2% of the world’s research output (Christian 2008); and implementation team benefits from networking with colleagues. Being part of the implementation team and working collaboratively with the entire implementation team, the authors share the challenges and best practices learnt first-hand.

FOR IFLA HQ (login required)

Edit item Edit item